AI Transparency in Healthcare

IBM Service Design Challenge

TIMELINE

Nov 2024 - May 2025

SUMMARY

ECHO, a digital platform that fosters transparent communication between speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and families around the use of AI, addressing critical gaps in AI trust, cultural responsiveness, and explainability within pediatric speech therapy.

MY ROLES

UX Design Lead: I managed project planning and timelines, balanced critical decisions, and guided research and design efforts to keep the team aligned and collaborative, successfully meeting each milestone throughout the 8-month design challenge


User Researcher: Proposed scalable design solutions by leading workshops with patients, clinicians, and AI engineers to balance stakeholder needs with technical feasibility

KEY ACHIEVEMENTS

Awarded 2nd place out of 200+ international teams

CONTEXT

Mitigating bias in AI healthcare is one of the biggest task faced worldwide

During the 2025 Student service design challenge, IBM challenged teams to design equitable services that help human navigate bias. We chose to tackle the challenge in the complex space of AI healthcare, exploring and paving the way toward equitable and unbiased future.

$4.9 trillion

spend in U.S. healthcare, creating pressure for more efficient, tech-enabled solutions

> 40% underdiagnosis

are experienced by underserved populations

Among 11 high-income countries…

U.S. ranked last in health equity, reflecting deep disparities in care

AT A GLANCE

A trusted and transparent AI Healthcare

Echo serves as the first step of trust building between patients and AI Healthcare. It facilitates doctor patient communication on AI usage before, during, and after visits. For doctors, Echo is also a research hub to understand AI and build trust with it.

The application is streamlined online and includes dedicated section about AI usage information.

PROBLEM FRAMING

Understanding from the source: clinical research to speech-language pathologist

To deeply understand the problem space, I spoke with diverse range of professionals working in the healthcare system:

  • Seattle Clinical researchers focused on recruitment and trial design

  • UW Health equity experts studying access & bias

  • Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) working in various settings (hospitals, schools, private clinics)

  • AI/ML engineers building healthcare tools

  • Patients and caregivers with lived experience in speech therapy

I mapped out the system map of stakeholder relations in the clinical research context to understand the interactions and values exchange in between

KEY INSIGHT

Transparency gap in AI usage result from limited communication between doctors and patients

72%

Patients demanded transparency in how healthcare AI makes decisions

80%

Patients were comfortable with AI in care if clinicians understood and explained it

48%

Clinicians agreed utilization of AI tools can increase the risk to patient privacy

PROBLEM STATEMENT

How might we create a single source of transparency that helps patients communicate clearly, and support clinicians in using AI ethically and efficiently despite time constraints, cultural gaps, and limited system guidance?

IDEATION

Make ideas spark through complexity

I organized brainstorming sessions where we explored human-AI collaboration models, balancing automation with clinician oversight. While we had many great ideas, I made sure to prioritize concepts that would best bring out our design objectives of transparency, voice, and reflection.

Ideas brainstormed based on critical user needs

We didn't implement all of them because…

Could stigmatize patients by labeling them based on race or diagnosis, reducing trust instead of building it.

Information overload in waiting rooms could confuse patients and overwhelm clinicians.

Low technical feasibility, creating friction for patients and providers instead of integrating seamlessly into existing workflows

Patient side features focus on communication

AI Explanation Layer

Simple visuals and language showing what the AI analyzed and why

Voice of the Patient

A channel for patients to share feedback on AI-driven results

Research opportunity

Voluntary option for patients to contribute data to strengthen AI models

wireframe of patient side phone screen

Clinician side features focus on feedback and community

Bias Flags

Alerts for potential dataset mismatches (e.g., bilingual cases)

Feedback Loop

Patient feedback integrated into clinicians’ workflows for continuous improvement

Insight community

A collaborative space for clinicians to access research insights from the community to facilitate diagnosis

Wireframe of clinician side screen

ITERATION

Validate designs with real-world use case

I conducted a co-design session with a speech-language pathologist, who confirmed the value of contextual intake and AI explanation features. I iterated based on their feedback, simplifying workflows and clarifying client-facing language.

1

Adding summary on critical information of community resources helps clinicians utilize it quickly and effectively.

2

Showing personalized bias considerations of patient's overall file is more useful than listing out general bias considerations of AI tools.

FINAL DESIGN

Context-rich intake form that adds transparency in AI usage

Collects detailed patient information to ensure AI considers personal, cultural, and contextual factors

Patient's AI acceptance note that makes clinicians feel confident

Provides clinicians with a comprehensive patient profile to guide accurate, personalized decisions

Clinician networking to grow trust in AI

Connects clinicians to shared research, cases, and AI insights across their professional network

Community resources for continuous improvements in the healthcare system

Central hub for accessing datasets, guidelines, and tools to design, monitor, and refine AI systems

IMPACT METRICS

How I would evaluate impact

Increased satisfaction of application process

Parent users submit enriched intake form that enables them to add contextual and cultural details and compare the perceived usability or satisfaction score with previous form.

Reduction rate in clinician prep time

Time spent preparing for sessions, by using Echo’s AI-supported summaries and context views which flag potential biases.

Improved percieved transparency of AI use

Parents’ understanding on how AI is (or isn’t) used in their child’s care, as measured by a post-visit survey & clinicians’s perceived transparency after using Echo Insights for guidance.

LEARNINGS

0 to 1 is a process of deconstruct and rebuilding the mindset

Leading a team to explore an unfamiliar space pushed me to be even more proactive. A key challenge I faced was the need to quickly adjust our project direction based on emerging research. To keep the team aligned, I organized debriefing sessions after each interview and reflection meetings after every round, which were effective approaches that fostered shared understanding and agility.


I’m proud that through hard work and the courage to step outside our comfort zones, we achieved a well-deserved accomplishment!

The amazing Healthcare and Humanity team! What a journey we've been through together!!

Thanks for stopping by;)

Glad I was able to share a piece of me with you.

The story goes on…


@ Janet Chen, 2025